You bring your initial proposal work (ATTACHED BELOW) (topic, purpose statement, research questions, and hypothesis) (Proposal attached)to a stakeholder committee, which is comprised of your manager and other senior-level people. They react and you take NOTES. (Notes are below.)
What, if any, biases do you detect in the steering committee members' remarks?
At this point, are they using reflective or expedient decision-making methods? What do you need to do to address their concerns
Notes
Juicy Red Tomato Company
Steering Committee Meeting notes
Discussed research proposal
HR manager comments - agreed with everything, seemed a little upset
that her suggestions were not followed previously
Agri director disagrees that wages are not adequate - "after all we're
using migrant workers" Also argued that JRT provides housing for
workers, so that should count as compensation.
IT manager commented he's been fighting for budget to improve
communications but has been denied funding
President believes that field personnel will not use "hi tech toys" like
cellphones and pdas
CFO commented that if JRT starts paying production people more, profit
margin will be destroyed.
Thank you.
In references to the Juicy Red Tomato Company scenario, this solution identifies and describes the biases detected in the steering committee members' remarks. The type of decision-making is also identified e.g. reflective vs expedient decision-making methods as well as what the steering committee needs to do to address their concerns.