Law Homework Solutions
Problem
#51924

International Law

Goliath, Inc., a United States producer of gem quality sapphires, set up a subsidiary holding company in the Cayman Islands (Junior, Ltd.) to control all of Goliath's non-United States subsidiaries.

Junior then entered into a cartel agreement with producers of sapphires in those countries (other than the US) where sapphires are found. The cartel agreement allocated markets and set prices for all sapphires sold outside of the United States.

The United States government has now brought suit against both Goliath and Junior for violating the US Sherman Antitrust Act. Goliath answers that it was not a party to the cartel agreement and that the agreement does not affect the US market for sapphires. Junior answers that it is not subject to the jurisdiction of the US courts. Are Goliath and Junior correct? I tried to look at this from both perspectives, but I need some more thoughts on this case.


Solution Summary

Understanding Subsidies and Cartels.  Explains what qualifies a cartel and when subsidies can be used.  How does the Sherman Anti-Trust Act apply to foreign businesses.  Examples provided with web resources and citations.

Solution
What is this?
By OTA - Overall OTA Rating
Purchase Cost Now
$2.19 CAD (was ~$11.97)
Included in Download
  • Plain text response
Why you can trust BrainMass.com
  • Your Information is Secure
  • Best Online Academic Help Service
  • Students find real academic Success
Related Solutions
  • Introduction to International Law is presented. - Goliath, Inc., a United States producer of gem quality sapphires, set up a subsidiary holding company in the Cayman Islands (Junior, Ltd.) to control all of Goliath's non-United States subsidiaries. ...
  • Law and the court system - Deliverable Length: 500-900 words and 3 sources You have been told that you and one of the company senior partners will be attending a US Court of Appeals hearing in the near future. To prepare you f ...
  • 6 scenerios that can be possibly heard in the US court of appeals and explain why. - In a email format please help explaining which of the cases below that would be heard in the US Court of Appeals and explain why. 1. A case involving a dispute between Colorado, Utah and Arizon ...
  • Federal Diversity Jurisdiction - I am not sure if I am understanding this correctly as I know that a case can only be heard in the jurisdiction that the crime is committed but what does the federal diversity consist of in defining "f ...
  • Why is personal jurisdiction an issue for those who post Websites? - Why is personal jurisdiction an issue for those who post Websites? What are some reasons that a website owner might be concerned with whether a court is able to obtain 'personal jurisdiction' over t ...
Browse