Philosophy Homework Solutions

Using all 18 rules in natural deduction to answer proofs.

* represents dot and > represents horse shoe #1 1. Av(B*C) 2. A>B / B #2 1.A=B 2.AvB 3.A>(B>C) /C #3 1. M*T 2.(M*D)>K 3.(K*T)>~D /~D #4 1.(A*B)>(C*D) 2.(DV~A)> E*F 3.~F /~B

Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion of each argument.

---------------------------------------------- DIRECTIONS FOR TRANSLATIONS Translate the following statements into symbolic form. Use the letters O, C, M, P, R, N, and L as needed. Use (> for horseshoe) (* for dot)(v wedge)(=tripple bar)(~tilde) ----------------------------------------------- 1. Nikon will introduce a new ...continues

Evaluation of Argument Against Parfits Reductionism

HI, below is an argument against Parfit's reductionsim theory. I am not sure if I covered it good enough. And if it is a good, valid rgument, what can I do to better this argument in light of objections to Parfits argument? Any additional information would be great help, and if there are any errors please let me know. Is there a ...continues

What does thinking about the fact of existentialism - 'reflecting upon reflecting' - tell us ?

Suppose predictions of cosmologists come true and the universe will one day collapse into a primordial atom - perhaps as a precursor to another 'big bang' - and every remnant of causality is obliterated. Alternatively - since some now believe the universe to be accelerating outwards due to the repulsive character of the 'dar ...continues

Descartes' Meditations in the end of Medieval Thought and the beginning of Modern Thought.

The publication of Descartes' Meditations has been identified as a defining episode marking the end of Medieval Thought and the beginning of Modern Thought. Discuss this view and make clear what particular themes or ideas in the Meditations support this interpretation.

Insight into the relationship between humans and our modern technology.

Where are human lives heading with modern technology?

Determining whether a sentence is consistent.

Marx's claim that "The communists preach no morality at all." Is he being consistent?

What are the underlying principles that lead Nietzsche to attack Christianity, pacifism and democracy?

What are the underlying principles that lead Nietzsche to attack Christianity, pacifism and democracy?

Mill's conception of Utilitarianism versus Jeremy Bentham's.

In what respects is Mill's conception of Utilitarianism different from that of Jeremy Bentham's?

ARGUMENTS OF AND AGAINST GOD'S EXISTENCE

The arguments for the existence of God, as famously outlined in the five ways of Thomas Aquinas (in his Summa Theologica) were meant to provide a convincing proof for the existence of God. It was not original with Aquinas. From the very beginnings of Western Philosophy, Pre-Socratic philosophers argued for a transcendent being ...continues

Browse