Orwell's style

Politics and the English Language
George Orwell

(editor's note: Please be careful with this text--Orwell [Blair] had
just finished collaborating with the B.B.C. against fascists in India
in World War II, and wrote this text in part to justify the work his
journalism had done--for the Empire. Unlike his work with the PMRC in
Catalonia, however, he was working within an autocratic institution;
his opinions here show evidence of a fair bit of oligarchical bias.
So please don't take this piece as a flawless argument for the role
of social intervention into problematic discursive practices, but
rather as a very specific historical one--where the left had been
forced to work with capitalists to curtail fascist imperialism--and
then had to reinvent itself after the Allied Powers had won. A
similar reinvention is under way today--look at a few of the texts in
the 'Progressive' folder of this server for examples--and I
post this work to point out the danger of oligarchical imperialism
so prevalent in almost all American political discourse today.)
Most people who bother with the matter at all would admit that the
English language is in a bad way, but it is generally assumed that we
cannot by conscious action do anything about it. Our civilization is
decadent, and our language--so the argument runs--must inevitably
share in the general collapse. It follows that any struggle against
the abuse of language is a sentimental archaism, like preferring
candles to electric light or hansom cabs to aeroplanes. Underneath
this lies the half-conscious belief that language is a natural growth
and not an instrument which we shape for our own purposes.
Now, it is clear that the decline of a language must ultimately have
political and economic causes: it is not due simply to the bad
influence of this or that individual writer. But an effect can become
a cause, reinforcing the original cause and producing the same effect
in an intensified form, and so on indefinitely. A man may take to
drink because he feels himself to be a failure, and then fail all the
more completely because he drinks. It is rather the same thing that is
happening to the English language. It becomes ugly and inaccurate
because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language
makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts. The point is that the
process is reversible. Modern English, especially written English, is
full of bad habits which spread by imitation and which can be avoided
if one is willing to take the necessary trouble. If one gets rid of
these habits one can think more clearly, and to think clearly is a
necessary first step towards political regeneration: so that the fight
against bad English is not frivolous and is not the exclusive concern
of professional writers. I will come back to this presently, and I
hope that by that time the meaning of what I have said here will have
become clearer.