Purchase Solution

Karl Popper, conjecture & refutations

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Explain why, according to Popper, the falsifiability of a theory is the most important criterion for a theory to be scientific. How does this claim relate to the "problem of induction?

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

The expert explains the falsifiability of a theory being the most important criterion for a theory to be scientific.

Solution Preview

Please see attached file.

Hi, Please see comments below. Hope this helps.
QUESTION: Karl Popper, conjecture & refutations
Explain why, according to Popper, the falsifiability of a theory is the most important criterion for a theory to be scientific. How does this claim relate to the "problem of induction?

Popper rejected induction outright (i.e. the outcome of an experiment can never favours a hypothesis, and no positive evidence for a theories truth is possible) and sought an alternative, deductivist account of the scientific method. Popper saw Hume as 'clear and conclusive' on the question of induction, regarding inductive inference as in no way rationally justifiable. However, Popper rejected Hume's 'psychological' explanation/solution, opting rather for falsification as his 'resolution' of the problem. The approach is more a circumvention of the problem than an actual answer - i.e. it is supposed to show how science might avoid using induction altogether, rather than how induction might be justified.

Popper's basic idea is that while we cannot ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy

Short quiz relating to Descartes

The World Health Organization

This quiz assesses the students knowledge about the World Health Organization. Although listed under “Philosophy” it is relevant to health care, political science, pre-med, and social scientist students as well.

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Approaches to Learning: Compare and contrast Kuhn and Poppe

    Maybe Karl Popper has the answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6 (2), 272-290.

  • Importance of Verifying Content Sources

    A good example of this, given the global climate of 2020 and 2021, would be the conjecture and background research - often used to justify said conjecture - around virology and the human immune system.

  • Falsificationism

    References: Barnhart J 1996, "Karl Popper: philosopher of critical realism" Humanist, retrieved on April 14, 2008 from: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-18501025.html Fetzer, J 1978, "The Philosophy of Karl Popper by Robert John Ackermann" Philosophy

  • Logical Positivism

    Karl Popper was a critic of Logical positivism. He viewed meanings as false rather than verifiable. Many other critics viewed it as not completely verifiable, and others responded by stating that no system is entirely consistent.

  • Immunology

    So my challenge to you this week is to address those questions - maybe after checking out some summaries of major philosophical contributions (for example Google Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, and/or Imre Lakatos - or try a few websites that offer thumbnail

  • Philosophies of Science in Nursing

    Karl Popper Popper is one of the proponents of critical rationalism.

  • Exploring Post-positivism and Modernism

    For post-positivists like Karl Popper, positivism limits scientific research and does not take account of the true nature of the social world.

  • Theory & the Philosophy of Science: An analysis

    This is where the Philosophy of science comes in as the works of theorists like Feyerabend, Karl Popper, Descartes, Nagel and Kant come into play. How do you 'think through' research?

  • Positivism and the Law of Non-Contradiction

    Non-Contradiction One of the biggest critics of logical positivism is Karl Popper.

View More Related Solutions